The shameful silencing of free speech throughout American higher education is a terrible blot on the whole idea of American education. Today’s college students, led astray by their professors and college administrators, have interrupted, harassed, and even prevented invited conservative speakers from speaking at their institutions.
At UC Berkeley recently a young man distributing conservative material was punched in the mouth by a leftwing protestor who could not tolerate any dissemination of material with which he disagreed. At Middlebury College a few years ago, esteemed political scientist and best-selling author Charles Murray was harassed by students after being invited to speak. And so it goes, one after another conservative voice is drowned out by subversive college students who are routinely supported by their progressive professors and administrators who apparently don’t give a damn about The First Amendment.
Of course, there are degrees of silencing free speech. Some may seem mild, but totalitarianism can creep in on little cat feet.
The Cover-Up
At Washington & Lee University in Lexington, Virginia, the first step in silencing free speech has been to cover up the recumbent statue of Robert E. Lee in Lee Chapel during school assemblies.
It’s been decided by the president of the university that it’s necessary to appease those in the faculty, among the administration, and within the student body who disapprove of Lee. But the real question is: Why are those who disapprove of Lee attending or working at an institution named, in part, to honor Lee’s reputation?
Furthermore, why would a young man or woman want to matriculate at W&L if he or she didn’t respect the man the university is named for?
To solve what some thought a blemish on the university, a commission was formed to consider changes to the university, even to renaming it. But why? Was it only after the events in Charlottesville, where the statue of Robert E. Lee was going to be pulled down, that W&L administrators and faculty members thought maybe they, too, should reconsider the prominence of Lee?
What Does Diversity Mean?
The other worry was that W&L was not diverse enough. Most progressive academics consider “diversity” to mean attracting students of multiple races and income levels. The truth is, W&L has always attracted students from throughout the country. But the bottom line is: W&L seemed deficient in comparison with other similar liberal arts institutions.
But to have true diversity among the student body, prospects of every race, gender, and income level must be able compete with everyone else and be admitted on merit. True diversity at a competitive institution depends on fair, not manipulated, competition.
Prospects from lower income families, too, should have a equal chance to attend W&L, assuming they qualify on merit. There should always be enough grants, scholarships, and work-study programs to fill their need.
Solving the Problems at W&L
At W&L there are two obvious problems: One is to find a way to admit more blacks despite being named after a southern Civil War general. The other is to make sure all students feel proud to attend W&L.
The answer to these problems depends on making sure prospects realize how much Lee, the educator, contributed to Washington College–named after its first benefactor, George Washington—to transform it into the outstanding university it has become.
First, they must understand how Lee improved an existing honor system, administered by the students, that enables students to walk out of a classroom while taking a test, only signing a pledge that they have neither given nor received aid during the exam. It also enables students to leave their books, bikes, electronic devices, or articles of clothing anywhere on campus, without worrying that someone will take them.
The fact that W&L has a journalism and a law school is also due to educational innovations instituted by Lee, who, as president during the last years of his life, understood that the defeated south needed to equip itself to play a meaningful part in a newly united country. This aspect of Lee’s life after the War marks him as a man who understood that defeat can also lead to resurrection.
Why Robert E. Lee Must Be Honored
All of Lee’s achievements as president of a struggling southern college prove that he believed the south could rise again and could overcome the disgrace of slavery, which, by the way, was not only a problem in the south. No wonder Lee was honored by having his name added to the name of the institution he served so well.
The true story of Robert E. Lee, however, includes graduating from West Point, rising to become an outstanding officer in the U.S. Army, serving as superintendent of West Point and, finally, being appointed president of Washington College in 1865.
Covering the recumbent statue of Robert E. Lee in Lee Chapel is a mistake. It superimposes a political point of view that diminishes the virtues implied in the statue of the man it hides. And it reinforces the violence of those who wish to silence free speech.
Jim’s Daily Rant is owned and operated by James I. Greene. All rights protected by copyright from reproduction without permission.